The below article originally published in the June issue of Arkansas Money & PoliticsĀ
When it comes to big-time college sports, Arkansas State University and the University of Arkansas rarely operate on a level playing field. The Razorback athletic department pulls in nearly seven times more total revenue than the ASU Red Wolves.
There is one place Arkansasā largest sports programs stand on equal ground: each schoolās head football coach has a contract demanding the same amount of money for cutting out early. If the Hogsā Bret Bielema had decided to break his six-year contract last year ā his first on the job ā he would have owed the U of A $3 million*. Three million is also what the Red Wolvesā new coach Blake Anderson would pay to leave ASU during his first year. This symmetry is all the more striking because Bielemaās and Andersonās salaries arenāt even close: Bielema makes $3.2 million a year, Anderson makes $700,000.
Conversely, if they leave at the behest of the schools, the coaches can look to pocket some walking-away money.
Itās all a matter of strategy and context, a common game played by universities across the country. Still, fans can be certain of one thing: in the world of coachesā contracts, terms for parting ways matter every bit as much as the salary.
***
See: Mike Anderson Sends Emotional “Goodbye” Message to Hog Fans
***
In the biggest conferences, a $3 million buyout provision isnāt all that large. In a conference as relatively small as ASUās Sun Belt, though, this kind of number is almost certainly unprecedented ā much like the situation in which ASU football finds itself on the whole.
āWhen youāve gone through what weāve gone through the last few years,ā ASU athletic director Terry Mohajir said, āyou learn a little bit.ā
Since 2010, ASU has hired four different coaches. The first ā Hugh Freeze ā had a first-year buyout of $225,000. For his successors, that figure jumped to $700,000, then to $1.75 million, and now to $3 million. Where it ends, nobody knows.
Decades ago, things were simpler. Major college football coaches typically signed one-year contracts, which would roll over to the next year if they did a good job. Things started changing in the 1980s with the advent of bigger broadcast deals and the proliferation of cable sports programming. As multi-year contracts prevailed in the late 1980s and 1990s, āthe institutions began looking for a commitment from the coach,ā U of A athletic director Jeff Long said. At first, āit was really a one-way street and now itās evolved into a two-way street on the contractual buyout terms.ā
In business terms, the institution is looking for security after investing in a risky asset ā the head football coach ā that can either add or lose a great amount of revenue. Perversely, either one makes the coach more likely to leave. A chronically underwhelming coach is likely to be fired by the school, while star performers are lured away by institutions with more elite programs.
Buyout contracts therefore typically work in two ways. If a university fires the head coach āat its convenience,ā legalese often translated to ātoo many games were lost,ā the school usually gives the coach a ton of money to go away. Bielema, for instance, would be paid $12.8 million if he were fired in this context in his first three seasons. For Anderson, the number is $3 million if heās let go in his first year. The University of Central Arkansasā Steve Campbell would be paid $7,000 a month for the remainder of his contract ending Dec. 31, 2017, if he were fired; and the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluffās Monte Coleman would get his annual base salary of $150,000 paid to him over 18 months.
In the 21st century, major college coachesā salaries ā and attendant buyouts ā have grown hand-in-hand.
āWhen coaches got hired, they used to only worry about how much they would make each year,ā agent Jimmy Sexton told ESPN in 2003. āNow they are worried about how much the school will pay them if they get fired. Thatās the nature of the business.ā
He should know. Coachesā agents like Sexton are a major reason contract sweeteners like buyout provisions became ubiquitous in the first place. One of his clients, Little Rock native Houston Nutt, head coach of the Razorbacks football program from 1998 to 2007, had one of the most scrutinized departures in program history.
Nutt resigned from Arkansas in November 2007 after accepting a $3.65 million severance package. He then went to Ole Miss and was paid a $4.35 million lump sum to leave in 2011. This limited the schoolās ability to pay premium dollar for its next coach, and is one reason the Rebels hired an up-and-comer like Hugh Freeze in December 2011.
Less than a year before, ASU had hired 41-year-old Freeze as head coach. For Freeze, it was a chance to call the shots at a high level after years as an assistant. ASU, meanwhile, rolled the dice on a relatively inexperienced but exciting talent. The Red Wolves got a potential star at a base salary of $151,660 for three seasons. If it didnāt work out in the 2011 season, ASU could simply pay back the remainder of his salary to let him go. If it did work and a bigger school wanted to hire him away, then Freezeās payback clause could come into effect.
That type of buyout establishes what a university is to be paid if the coach terminates his own contract. If he accepts a job elsewhere, the hiring university usually pays this amount.
Much of that money is in turn used by the former to search for and hire a replacement. In 2011, after Freeze led ASU to its best season in decades and won a Sun Belt title, Ole Miss picked up the tab for Freezeās buyout of $225,000.
The next two head coaches ASU hired ā Gus Malzahn and Bryan Harsin ā followed similar paths and jumped ship after one season.
Not surprisingly, Arkansas State has upped the ante for Blake Anderson, who like his predecessors was an offensive coordinator favoring a fast pace. If Anderson leaves before his first year ends on Jan. 31, 2015, heāll owe ASU $3 million. The same amount would be owed after his second season, then $2 million after the third and fourth seasons.
āWhen youāre hiring emerging coaches, you have a little bit more leverage with them,ā Mohajir said, when asked how these relatively high amounts were reached. āIf youāre hiring good guys, youāre trying to keep them around.ā
Mohajir said that during negotiations, Anderson ānever blinked an eyeā at the buyout provision amounts.
Top assistant coaches are also inking long-term contracts. Here, though, many assistants are given contractual exceptions not afforded head coaches, whose exit usually means wholesale change.
At the UofA, both top assistants have multi-year contracts and buyout clauses. Offensive coordinator Jim Chaney makes $550,000 a year while defensive coordinator Robb Smith makes $500,000. The contracts, however, spell out a potentially bigger difference: if Smith were to leave early to become a defensive coordinator in the NFL or college head coach, heās exempted from his $100,000 buyout. No such exception exists for Chaney. Associate athletic director Kevin Trainor pointed out contracts arenāt always followed precisely, though.
āIt doesnāt necessarily mean the university would seek liquidated damages in those situations,ā he said. āOur agreements are constantly evolving, and agreements can also be different depending on when they were negotiated.ā
A recent example of this occurred at the University of Central Arkansas (UCA). Last year, its head basketball coach Corliss Williamson terminated his contract and became an assistant with the NBAās Sacramento Kings. His contract stipulated UCA was owed $20,000 for the early exit, but UCA waived the buyout, its athletic director Brad Teague said.
Late last year, UCAās head football coach Clint Conque terminated his contract. After 14 years in Conway, he left to take the head coaching position for a conference opponent. By that time, Conque no longer owed buyout money to UCA but he had agreed to a non-compete provision that barred leaving to coach for another program in conference.
Teague, however, said he decided not to enforce this. āThe problem was, that made us out to be the bad guy,ā he said. āLetās assume we did block it, and now heās here and he had the opportunity to go somewhere else and we made him stay. How effective would he be?ā
Since football makes the most money in Arkansas, it usually produces the biggest coaching contracts. Basketball, though, is a clear second place.
Mike Anderson, the Hogsā head basketball coach, had a buyout of $550,000 after he was hired in 2011 by the UofA from his last job in Missouri. The university would expect to recoup this expense if Anderson cut out early on his current seven-year deal. His buyout, whether he leaves or is fired at the UofAās convenience, is set at $1 million for each of his contract years. But itās been awhile since other universities swooped in to poach Hog coaches. Indeed, in March, the womenās basketball coach, Tom Collen, was fired for not winning enough.
Mike Andersonās last three predecessors ā Nolan Richardson, Stan Heath and John Pelphrey ā were similarly dismissed. The four buyouts totaled more than $6 million, although the UofA may not have paid that entire amount. Some of the obligation is reduced by the salaries the fired coaches earn in their new jobs. Some hasnāt been paid. Pelphreyās buyout, for instance, remains on the UofA tab through this summer, Long said.
So, where does all this cash come from? Not from taxes. The Razorback Foundation ā the UofA athletic departmentās private fundraising arm that gets money from donations and revenue from premium seating sales ā pays for buyouts, Long said. Many Division I universities, like ASU, have their own athletic fundraising arms that do likewise.
āWeāre one of less than 20 universities [nationwide] that are totally self supporting,ā Jeff Long said of his department. āWe receive zero funds from the university, either in direct support or in student fees.ā
He added athletics annually gives more than $2 million a year back to the UofA for academics and non-athlete students.
This means sometimes buyout provisions can affect the lives of students who may not otherwise care about football. Such a scenario played out in 2012 at the University of Tennessee (UT), where its head coach and staff were fired and reportedly owed $9 million. The UT chancellor then said the athletic program would forgo the $18 million in contributions it was to make to the university over the next three years for academic scholarships and fellowship programs.
āItās shameful,ā Raymond Sauer, president of the North American Association of Sports Economists, told The New York Times in November 2012. āWe can understand the market forces at work, but all that money being burned up that way is a high cost of doing business.ā
Herein lies a silver lining for the UofA. Earlier, in the spring of 2012, former head football coach Bobby Petrino was found to have hired his mistress to a department job and then lied to his superior about his relationship with her. Jeff Long in turn found ājust causeā to fire him, which let Arkansas off the hook for a buyout that would have amounted to $18 million.
Petrinoās actions temporarily marred the reputation of the athletic department, but having to pay $18 million likely would have made the overall damage worse. Yet even had Petrino gotten what would have been a historic amount, itās unlikely lower salaries or buyouts would have resulted. There are, after all, too many boosters who care too much to allow their program to miss out on a potentially great coach for a few million dollars, especially when considering the kind of revenue a superstar coach can generate for a program.
āIf certain schools just decide that they wonāt pay this kind of money, itās competitive suicide for the university and political suicide for the university president,ā coach-hiring consultant Bill Carr told ESPN in 2003. āCollege sports is a cartel; everyone benefits from each otherās successes.ā
That will be true so long as college administrators, players, and fans alike keep buying in.
*The price of Bielema’s buyout for leaving drops $500,000 each year. Now in his second year, Bielema would owe the UA $2.5 million if he left for another job. Leaving in his third year would cost $2 million, and so on.
[…] Yes, Michigan has shown itās willing to pay its very top assistants more money than most other schools. And yes, with $25.3 million coming into its football program as donations from an enormous alumni base, it would be willing to pay off any buyout clause necessary to get the coach it wants – even Bielemaās hefty $12.8 million fee. […]
[…] will pony up $55 or more per person just to see Arkansas vs Toledo?,” Arkansas Fight’s Doc Harper asked. Ā “I can envision more people than usual staying on the golf […]
[…] progress. The failure is becoming, so becoming Bielema has removed himself from the hot seat and, with a reasonable $2.5 million buyout, could be a candidate for the Michigan job. The SEC West, […]